In issue https://github.com/termux/termux-packages/issues/6160 I have found
that community repo "its-pointless.github.io" specifies us as maintainer
for its packages. This is NOT TRUE and potentially misleads people using
these packages.
Now TERMUX_PKG_MAINTAINER will contain a default value which is neutral
and not specify maintainer. So all packages now have to override it to
the correct value.
[skip ci]
%ci:no-build
* termux-licenses: remove licenses that contain copyright information
These licenses cannot be taken from the common termux-licenses package as the copyright information needs to be distributed with the package as well.
271 packages in the main repository needs to be rebuilt after this change.
* termux_step_install_license: remove duplicated comment
* Bump packages that has a license with copyright information
We need to include this copyright information in the package so need
to rebuild them now that termux_step_install_license has been
modified.
The affected licenses are: MIT, ISC, PythonPL, Openfont-1.1, ZLIB,
Libpng, BSD, BSD 2-Clause, BSD 3-Clause.
* zlib: extract license file from zlib.h
* xorgproto: include all individual license files in package
* libgcrypt: include LICENSE file in package
It contains some copyright information so needs to be included in package
* libcrypt: add a dummy BSD 2-Clause license
According to homepage it is suppose to be BSD 2-Clause, but original
project did not include a license file
* libandroid-spawn: add LICENSE file to package
* libandroid-glob: add license file to package
* licenses: allow for comma separated TERMUX_PKG_LICENSE_FILE
%ci:no-build
* libicu: fix so that termux_step_install_license finds license file
%ci:no-build
* termux_step_install_license: check for license file as "License"
%ci:no-build
* libtiff: specify TERMUX_PKG_LICENSE_FILE
%ci:no-build
* asciidoctor: install license to standard location
* krb5: specify license file
* libdb: specify path to license file
%ci:no-build
* libprotobuf: specify path to license file
* darkhttpd: extract license file from darkhttpd.c
* w3m: ensure host libraries are not picked up
* w3m: extract LICENSE file from dock/README
* liblua{,52}: extract license files from doc/readme.html
* termux_step_install_license: look for License.txt as well
* dart: specify path to LICENSE file
* nim: specify license file
* runit: specify license file
* termux_step_install_license: look for LICENSE.TXT as well
* ossp-uuid: extract LICENSE from README
* pigz: extract LICENSE from pigz.c
* ttyrec: extract LICENSE from ttyrec.c
%ci:no-build
* bmon: specify license files
Most of the source files are licensed under MIT, it is not clear (to me) which
parts that are licensed under BSD 2-Clause.
%ci:no-build
* wordgrinder: specify license files
* fdupes: add LICENSE
* autossh: add LICENSE patch
* cmake: specify LICENSE file
* dos2unix: specify LICENSE file
* gnuplot: specify LICENSE file
* termux_step_install_license: look for variants of "copyright" also
* picolisp: specify LICENSE file
* lua-lpeg: extract license file
* tidy: specify license file
* gflags: specify LICENSE file
* timewarrior: fix src url
It seems to have been changed.
* postgresql: specify license file
* ttyrec: fix license patch header
* fossil: specify license file
* fmt: specify license file
* i2pd: specify license file
* leptonica: specify license file
* imgflo: add license file patch
* ired: add license file from ired github repo
* libzen: specify license file
* libmediainfo: specify license file
* mediainfo: specify license file
* tty-clock: add license patch
* samefile: add license patch
* quickjs: add license patch
* docbook-xml: add LICENSE patch
* docbook-xsl: specify LICENSE files
* gnuplot: configure with --without-latex
* timewarrior: add libshared to SRCURL as well
The non-release archives does not contain gitsubmodules so we need to
download it manually.
* restic: switch back to using 0.9.6 archive
* dart: revert revision bump
dart's SDK does not fully support python3 yet, and trying to solve
that is not entirely trivial. We save the dart bump (and upgrade to
2.8.4) for another day.
%ci:no-build
Specifying Termux org members is more correct as we don't have repo-specific
maintainers for termux-packages.
DEB control field specification doesn't allow to specify multiple people as
package maintainers. Value "Termux members @termux" will be used as default
for that field which can be overridden on per-package basis if needed.
%ci:no-build
